Comments on: Black Magic SEO! Vampire Weekend sucks SERPs

By: Dr Wordpress!

Dr Wordpress! — Fri, 06 Nov 2009 02:25:53 +0000

@Blake – the “real” backlink number is far higher I’m sure, for both sites.
.-= Dr WordPress!´s last blog ..Top 5 Biggest Lies About Blogging for Money =-.

By: Blake @ Props Blog Reviews

Blake @ Props Blog Reviews — Thu, 05 Nov 2009 21:47:56 +0000

LOL, that is pretty crazy. I can't believe they have so many backlinks. At least I can honestly say that I know I'm one of the 4 linking in ;-) .-= Blake @ Props Blog Reviews´s last blog ..Where Are Your Readers’ Eyes Going? =-.

By: Dr Wordpress!

Dr Wordpress! — Thu, 05 Nov 2009 19:23:57 +0000

I’m getting a little behind in comments here…

@zeesu – Google’s longevity weighting will work for you as time goes by. It’s worked for me in the past. Of course, they may change everything in the future, but I don’t think it will matter too much as long as you have useful content.

@Susan – Looking forward to some SERPiness.

@Sean – SERPs always vary a little bit. Sometimes from hour to hour.

@Extreme – I used be in the Marines, and I framed houses in Texas — with framers from Florida — so… I try to keep it toned down here.

@Elmot – No doubt!

@El3 – Longevity! Fire and forget! Just hang in there, it will work for you soon.

@Dana – “Let me Google that for you…”

@Walter – I’m really just taking a guess on whether they paid or not. One thing is for sure, if they didn’t pay outright, somebody did some _major_ hustling. I didn’t look up to see if they were on a major label. Curious now.
.-= Dr WordPress!´s last blog ..Top 5 Biggest Lies About Blogging for Money =-.

By: Walter

Walter — Thu, 05 Nov 2009 18:15:58 +0000

Humor aside, this post does contain useful info on how to gauge a website's stickiness on the web and how to discern between organic and paid traffic. .-= Walter´s last blog ..In San Francisco, Composting Is The Law =-.

By: Dana @ Online Knowledge

Dana @ Online Knowledge — Thu, 05 Nov 2009 13:49:15 +0000

What the heck of back link. I am interested to learn how come the backlink as that much. .-= Dana @ Online Knowledge´s last blog ..Atahualpa 3.4.4 Configuration =-.

By: El3ments

El3ments — Thu, 05 Nov 2009 04:15:23 +0000

There is a blog that I found on Google. It hasn't had a post since 2007 however it's page rank is still 4. Doesn't make any sense to me. Something new for google to work on I guess. .-= El3ments´s last blog ..Interesting News Articles =-.

By: elmot

elmot — Thu, 05 Nov 2009 03:17:34 +0000

Funny crazy post Dave, LOL!

These people have deep pocket to score such big hits of so many back links…vampires indeed!
.-= elmot´s last blog ..Having Faith with Fate =-.

By: Extreme John

Extreme John — Thu, 05 Nov 2009 01:47:47 +0000

Dave this is by far one of the funniest posts I have read of yours yet, it's nice to see that sense of humor come out. I do have to ask though how exactly do you think you nailed such an odd keyword? .-= Extreme John´s last blog ..Halloween Costume Contest Pictures and Voting =-.

By: Sean

Sean — Wed, 04 Nov 2009 17:28:21 +0000

You came up first in the search for me just now, though maybe google remembers that I like this site or something silly. @zeesu, I think you are right, I have a sight that is the number 1 result for a search of the words in the domain name, even though there are only 5 blog posts from a couple years ago there. .-= Sean´s last blog ..Why Printmaking? (A Study in Polarity) =-.

By: zeesu

zeesu — Wed, 04 Nov 2009 14:16:07 +0000

i know it can be very frustating.i think google gives lot of weight how long the domain name have been live.