Does Google Think You’re a Dirty Rotten Spammer? (Hint: anchor text matters)

(Reading time: 3 – 5 minutes)

Ok, listen up people…

I have something really important to say:

Stop effing up your anchor text.

Please, stop it.

Yes, I know we all love (luv) links back from your blog.

Yes, it is a favor and it does bleed you a little Google Juice every link.

And yes, your anchor text will help rank that link for those keywords.

Wait.

Stop.

Do you really understand that last claim?

Honestly, from what I see, you probably don’t.

Most people have no clue about anchor text.

I see it all the time.

Anchor text rules

Here’s the RULE: Anchor text should have 2-5 keywords/phrase for the link.

When you’re not sure how to anchor your link, here’s your procedure:

  1. You want to link to someone. Excellent!
  2. ASK them for their preferred keywords or phrases.
  3. Use what they tell you for your anchor text linking to their article.

Otherwise, you might as well use “Click here.”

Because the alternative is worse: you anchor phrases against the keywords in the article. Dude, that’s what link spammers do! You don’t want to Google to think your friends are link spammers, do you?

(Exceptions: If you link an article by it’s title, it’s ok to anchor the whole title. Lazy, but ok. If you’re pranking, let’s talk.)

Once you get the hang of it, you will be able to figure out appropriate anchor text on your own.

Here’s a hypothetical example.

Suppose your friend writes an article about how nasty bad spammers and the evilness of black hat SEO techniques. Then, your perfectly well-meaning self comes along. You love this article. You want to love (luv) it with links. So you anchor the link with “my friend’s great article.”

Nice.

Now the search is going to attempt to associate “friend’s great article” with evil black hat SEO. That doesn’t really compute. Further, it won’t help drive your qualified readers down that link.

Sure, your friends are the coolest. Everyone already knows that. But if they have a need for specific information about black hat SEO, they’re going to find out by accident, not because you alerted them via keyword-anchored link.

Ok, now that I’ve stirred it all up, here’s more unpleasantry:

  1. Linking is NOT easy. I’ve written on this before: the search engine IS part of your audience. If you only write for yourself and human readers, you’re shortchanging yourself long term.
  2. Your rants will be quickly forgotten by readers and by search engines. Unless your rant is long enough and has enough of a point to carry meaningful keyword phrases, it’s going to be hard get it ranked in search engines. And that kind of stinks because rants are fun and easy to write.

    Conversely, crap like how to implement register_activation_hook in WordPress plugins is hard to write (because it has to be accurate and precise) and won’t do much for your current readers… but it’s easy to anchor and brings in search traffic like crazy in the long term.

Now I can see the smoke pouring out your ears. The gears have seized up, the oil is burning, you have dozens or hundreds of blog posts full of crappy backlinks.

Bummer.

But wait! There’s hope.

See, I’m running this little month-long program starting around the first of May. It’s called the Blog Maintenance Challenge. And one of the Challenges is unscrewing your anchor text. You’re going to choose a couple of your flagship blog posts or pages, and you’re going to fix your links to them. And if you don’t have any links to them (shame), you’re going to learn how to do it right.

Then you’re going to fix your links from your articles to all your nice friend’s articles, so that Google doesn’t think you’re all a bunch of Dirty Rotten Spammers.

That’s doing link luvin’ right!

Sign up for the newsletter below or up in the right corner. I’ll send you to the sales page when it’s ready.

Antti Kokkonen – When it has to be done right

(Reading time: 3 – 5 minutes)

You those people who always seem to get it right, the first time? I know a blogger like that, and his name is Antti Kokkonen.

I first ran across Antti when following up on some material on permalinks. The backstory is the SEO crowd gets better luck with permalinks one way (use keyword-friendly categories), but the performance crowd insists the SEO way is stupid, because looking up named slugs in WordPress takes too many queries (that means it’s slower).


The discussion in the WordPress community seems to hinge around an implementation issue, but it doesn’t look like it’s going to be addressed any time soon.

In any case, Antti did something over the course of two articles which is too rare: he did research, got numbers, and published his data. In fact, he examined the permalink structure for the top 100 blogs. He found that there is no one best way to construct permalinks. Bummer!

In a second article he explains exactly how WordPress handles permalinks. While this second article is a bit more advanced, I recommend it to anyone serious about mastering permalinks. Antti also makes a definite recommendation for permalink structure, and I’ll be changing my permalink structure as a result.

Antti hasn’t posted in a couple of days. I’m getting worried. He’s working on an article on blog post SEO. My guess is it will be epic. Having written a series of articles on WordPress SEO myself, I’m very curious to see how my work compares.

You can follow Antti on twitter as zemalf.

hRecipe donations

Many thanks to these donors for hRecipe development:

Week in Review

The Week In Review Series

Last WIAW Week in Review
iPhone Blogging – Writing is so last millennium (& the Last Week in Review). Personal dictation is becoming a reality for everyone, talk right into your cell phone. But efficient dictation takes practice. Find out more…

Next WIAW Week in Review

Stay tuned…