Need a WordPress website this weekend? Start here...

How Social Networks Are Changing Psychology

(Reading time: 5 – 8 minutes)

Listen to this post:

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

socialnetworksWith all the emphasis on the “social” in social media, there is a growing interest in how social networking is changing our interpersonal psychology.

In fact, I was recently interviewed for an article on this very topic. It was an interesting interview because it moved me to think more deeply about the ways in which rapid, instant communication and information sharing is impacting our personal perspectives and relationships. And I believe it is having discernible effects.

3 keys for social network psychology

From a personal perspective, I see social networks as changing our psychology in three key ways:

  1. We find it easier to compare ourselves to others.

    This can have pros and cons, of course- dependent, most of the time, on whether we are doing “better than” or “worse than” those in our social networks. The problem with comparing ourselves to others is that we’ll always find people who are better, or worse, than us. Clearly, our own sense of self and personal viewpoint needs to rely on something else than social comparisons.

  2. We have access to more resources than ever before.

    If you are stuck or need help, you can ask on Twitter, and get almost instant feedback or solutions. This can be a life-saver, or, at minimum, very useful, depending on your context and circumstances. By having more access to resources, we are better able to reach our personal goals, which can help us feel more confident and secure.

  3. We can approach people more easily and more fluidly.

    It’s easy to send a Facebook “poke” or a small gift to someone you’d like to meet, but haven’t yet met. This can be a low stress, low rejection way to make contact. Access via social networks can help us live into the idea that there are only a few people separating us from people we’d most like to know. (The “six degrees of separation” idea.)

These are all great benefits, but there is a cost.

Cost of social networking

What are the downsides of social networking in terms of our personal psychology?

  1. We might mistake digital intimacy for true intimacy.

    True intimacy comes from shared experiences and shared meaning, most of which occur real-time, face to face. It can be easy to get caught up in your own hype or your own online popularity, without remembering that when the computer shuts down, so does your social life. We need a balance between digital and real-life intimacy in order to be truly fulfilled.

  2. We might regret high levels of transparency.

    I often tell clients, “Google never forgets”, which means that items you post online will mostly likely be accessible forever- or, at least, for a very, very long time. If you post something in a fit of anger, or with poor judgment, you might be living with regret about this for a long time. Feeling regret and shame around something you did, which you can’t control, has huge psychological implications.

  3. We get caught up in numbers, forgetting its about relationships.

    Ok, admit it, when you log into Twitter, don’t you check on your number of followers? I know I do. Partly, of course, this is to make sure my ideas and messages are being well received- but, also, of course, it’s a sign of growing popularity and increasing reach.

Is fame the answer?

So many of us want to be famous, and social media gives us a chance to experience that rush of attention and focus. Who wouldn’t want to be seen as a “social media rock-star?” The reality is, though, that in terms of real relationships, our capacity to be deeply connected to people is limited to about 10 people.

Even if you have thousands in your tweetstream, my belief is that the functional benefit to you does not increase exponentially as your followers grow.

Certainly, more followers or friends means more pathways of information distribution. But there will always be a core group who will focus on you, invest in you, and purchase from you; and it takes more than a few Tweets to activate larger and growing numbers of these people.

In terms of relationships (and I’ll write more about this in another post), I see social networks as changing our relationships in very significant ways, too.

We know more, and faster

We have greater real-time updates of what people are doing- this can help us understand them better, in ‘micro-slices’ because we see how and where they are investing their time and energy. We can read profile pages and learn new things about people we know and love. Of course, the greater access to knowledge also increases the rate of and rapidity of communication, which can sometimes leave us scattered and unfocused because we have too much information coming in at once.

It is easier to ’shadow’ key people in our lives (or people we want to know), we can more easily “social engineer” meetings and connections. We might find it easier to make small talk, because we already know something about the person from his/her blog or podcast.

At the end of the day, social networks are useful for helping us find others like us– but do not trump the immediacy and benefits of real-time, real-life conversation. It is easy to be seduced into thinking that everyone in your social network is paying attention to you, all the time, but that is most likely not the case.

Who pays most attention to you?

The people who pay most attention to you are going to be those who meet you in real life, spend time with you, or are referred by other people. In order to most fully benefit from social media, we need to focus on both online AND offline connections. This means that you build a network of people online, and also aim to meet them in real life as soon as you can. Similarly, you must also build a network of “in-town” connections who can provide a sounding board, direct referrals, or other kinds of “real life” assistance.

When you focus on building both online and offline networks, you’ll have the best of both social worlds.

What strategies do you use to maintain strong relationships online and offline? Please give us your best ideas below.

And, if you’d like to access my 21 lesson e-course on building influence in social media, you can do that here: Build Influence e-course


Rachna Jain is the amazingly energetic entrepreneur driving Social Media Marketing Strategies, where you will find in-depth discussion of the latest technology and techniques in social media marketing.

Quick note on Twitter and followers… (drama-free zone)

(Reading time: 2 – 3 minutes)

Over the last few days, I’ve run across a few articles about Twitter, Twitter followers, being blocked and the like. Lots of drama. Hurt feelings. People not acting like they are supposed to act. Since I’m not quite sure I know how I’m supposed to act on Twitter (and I am quite sure the Social Media Police don’t) I have for you the

Short answer: I do what feels right.

And, the

Longer answer: I like Twitter, but I use it mostly to socialize. Since I don’t socialize (online) that much, I don’t use Twitter that much.

I do promote a fair number of interesting articles if: 1. I like the article, and 2. there is a handy Tweetmeme button (critical).

I don’t use tools such as Hootsuite or Socialoomph. Perhaps I should, but learning these tools is just another task in a long list of tasks I find much more interesting.

I no longer check my followers list, and haven’t for months. I’m not regular on Follow Friday, sometimes I don’t even log on Friday.

I am probably “leaving money on the table.” That’s fine for now. When I get the cash flow, maybe I’ll outsource what I need to do to collect this money. Or find the table. Or whatever.

I don’t care whether you autofollow, or autodm, or whatever. Go for it, knock yourself out. I just ignore that stuff. If it’s working for you, more power to you.

If you’re boring, I won’t read your stuff. If you post so much boring stuff it gets in the way of the good stuff, I might unfollow you. But I might not. I’m lazy that way, I don’t care enough.

If I haven’t followed you back, rest assured, it isn’t personal. If you think I should follow you and I’m not, you’re probably correct. As it turns out, I have an ad-hoc policy of following people I talk to. You don’t need to retweet anything, just have something interesting to say. Talk to me. Easy peasy.

My point is this: I keep it fun and don’t worry about it.

See you online.